The Effects of Aldosterone Antagonists in Patients With Resistant Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.

Department of Medicine, LRGHealthcare, Laconia, New Hampshire, USA; kdahal@lrgh.org. Department of Medicine, LRGHealthcare, Laconia, New Hampshire, USA; Department of Medicine, Miriam Hospital, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA; Department of Medicine, West Virginia School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA; Division of Nephrology, LRGHealthcare, Laconia, New Hampshire, USA.

American journal of hypertension. 2015;(11):1376-85

Abstract

BACKGROUND A few studies have shown aldosterone antagonists (AA) to be effective therapy in patients with resistant hypertension (RH). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies of AA in patients with RH. METHODS We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for studies on the use of AA in patients with RH. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model. The change in office and ambulatory blood pressures (BP), effects on biochemical profile, change in the number of antihypertensive agents, and adverse events were main outcomes. RESULTS We included 15 studies (3 randomized controlled trials, 1 nonrandomized comparative study, and 11 single-arm studies) with 1,204 total patients in the meta-analysis. In comparative studies, AA reduced systolic BP (SBP) by 24.26 mm Hg (95% CI: 8.65-39.87, P = 0.002) and diastolic BP (DBP) by 7.79 mm Hg (3.79-11.79, P = 0.0001). Similarly, AA reduced SBP by 22.74 mm Hg (18.21-27.27, P < 0.00001) and DBP by 10.49 mm Hg (8.85-12.13, P < 0.00001) in single-arm studies. AA resulted in significant change in serum electrolytes in single-arm studies but not in comparative studies. Significantly more adverse events were noted in single-arm studies but not in comparative studies. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of the current meta-analysis, we conclude that AA is safe and effective therapy in patients with RH.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Meta-Analysis

Metadata